EdTech, short for Educational Technology, refers to the application of technology to improve and enhance teaching and learning. It’s a rapidly evolving field that encompasses a wide range of tools, platforms, and methodologies designed to make education more accessible, engaging, personalized, and efficient.

The core idea behind EdTech is to leverage digital innovations to solve traditional educational challenges and create new opportunities for learning.

Key Components and Concepts of EdTech:

1. Online Learning Platforms (LMS – Learning Management Systems):
   • What it is: Digital environments where courses are hosted, content is delivered, assignments are submitted, and student progress is tracked. Examples include Moodle, Canvas, Google Classroom, and proprietary platforms like Coursera, edX, or Byju’s.
   • How it works: Provides a centralized hub for all learning activities, enabling online courses, blended learning, and flipped classrooms.
2. Interactive Content & Multimedia:
   • What it is: Moving beyond static textbooks to engaging formats like video lectures, interactive simulations, virtual labs, augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) experiences, and gamified content.
   • How it works: Makes learning more immersive, visual, and experiential, especially for complex subjects (e.g., virtually dissecting an animal, exploring ancient Rome in VR).
3. Adaptive Learning & Personalization:
   • What it is: Using AI and algorithms to tailor the learning path, content, and pace to each student’s individual needs, strengths, and weaknesses.
   • How it works: Identifies learning gaps, provides targeted feedback, and adjusts the difficulty level of exercises in real-time, allowing students to learn at their own pace.
4. Assessment & Analytics Tools:
   • What it is: Digital tools for creating and grading quizzes, assignments, and exams, along with analytics dashboards that provide insights into student performance and learning patterns.
   • How it works: Automates grading, provides immediate feedback to students, and gives teachers data to identify struggling students or areas where the curriculum needs adjustment.
5. Collaboration Tools:
   • What it is: Platforms that facilitate communication and group work among students and teachers, such as video conferencing software (Zoom, Google Meet), online discussion forums, and collaborative document editing tools.
   • How it works: Supports remote learning, group projects, and fosters a sense of community among learners.
6. Gamification:
   • What it is: Incorporating game-like elements (points, badges, leaderboards, challenges) into non-game contexts to increase engagement and motivation.
   • How it works: Makes learning more fun and competitive, encouraging persistence and mastery of concepts.
7. AI-Powered Tutors & Chatbots:
   • What it is: AI-driven tools that can answer student questions, provide explanations, offer practice problems, and even simulate conversations to help with language learning or doubt-solving.
   • How it works: Provides instant, personalized support outside of traditional classroom hours, acting as a supplemental learning aid.

Why is EdTech Important?

• Accessibility: Breaks down geographical barriers, making quality education available to learners regardless of their location (critical for rural areas like those near Nala Sopara). It supports remote learning and self-paced study for diverse learners.
• Personalization: Moves away from a “one-size-fits-all” model, tailoring education to individual learning styles and needs.
• Engagement: Makes learning more interactive, fun, and relevant through multimedia, gamification, and immersive experiences.
• Efficiency: Streamlines administrative tasks for educators, freeing up time for actual teaching and student interaction.
• Skill Development: Equips students with digital literacy and 21st-century skills essential for the modern workforce.
• Teacher Empowerment: Provides educators with new tools and resources to create dynamic lessons, track progress, and collaborate with peers globally.

EdTech in India (with Nala Sopara Context):

India has one of the largest and fastest-growing EdTech markets globally.

• Digital Divide: While EdTech offers immense potential for democratizing education, the challenge of internet connectivity and access to devices (digital divide) remains, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas. However, government initiatives and increasing smartphone penetration are gradually bridging this gap.
• Vernacular Content: A major trend is the development of EdTech content and platforms in various regional Indian languages (Hindi, Marathi, Tamil, Bengali) to cater to the vast non-English speaking student population. This directly benefits students in Nala Sopara who might prefer learning in Marathi.
• Upskilling & Reskilling: A significant portion of India’s EdTech sector focuses on professional upskilling and reskilling in areas like AI/ML, data science, digital marketing, and coding, driven by industry demand.
• Hybrid (Phygital) Models: The “pure online” model faced some challenges after the pandemic. Now, there’s a strong trend towards “phygital” (physical + digital) learning, where online platforms are complemented by offline learning centers or personalized tutor support.
• Affordability: EdTech companies are increasingly focusing on affordable pricing models to reach a wider audience, including those in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities.
• Government Initiatives: The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasizes the integration of technology in education, further boosting the EdTech sector.
• AI Integration: Generative AI is rapidly being adopted for personalized content creation, doubt-solving chatbots, and AI tutors, even in regional languages.

In essence, EdTech is fundamentally transforming education by making it more accessible, adaptive, and engaging through the strategic integration of technology, aiming to empower learners and educators alike.

What is EdTech?

EdTech, a portmanteau of Educational Technology, is the integration of technology into education to enhance the teaching and learning experience. It encompasses a broad range of tools, platforms, and methodologies designed to make education more accessible, engaging, personalized, and efficient.

At its core, EdTech aims to leverage digital innovations to address traditional challenges in education and create new opportunities for both learners and educators.

Key Aspects and Components of EdTech:

1. Online Learning Platforms (LMS – Learning Management Systems):
   • These are digital environments that host courses, deliver content, facilitate assignment submissions, and track student progress.
   • Examples: Moodle, Canvas, Google Classroom (for traditional institutions), and proprietary platforms like Coursera, edX, or India’s Byju’s, Unacademy, and Vedantu.
   • Purpose: To provide a centralized, organized hub for all learning activities, enabling fully online courses, blended learning (mix of online and offline), and flipped classrooms.
2. Interactive Content and Multimedia:
   • Moves beyond static textbooks to engaging formats such as video lectures, interactive simulations, virtual laboratories, augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) experiences, and gamified content.
   • Purpose: To make learning more immersive, visual, and experiential, particularly for complex subjects where hands-on experience is beneficial but might not be feasible physically (e.g., performing virtual science experiments, exploring historical sites in VR).
3. Adaptive Learning and Personalization:
   • Utilizes artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithms to tailor the learning path, content, and pace to each student’s individual needs, strengths, and weaknesses.
   • Purpose: To move away from a “one-size-fits-all” approach, providing targeted feedback, recommending specific resources, and adjusting the difficulty level of exercises in real-time, allowing students to learn at their optimal pace.
4. Assessment and Analytics Tools:
   • Digital tools for creating, administering, and grading quizzes, assignments, and exams. They often include dashboards that provide insights into student performance, identify learning gaps, and track progress over time.
   • Purpose: To automate tedious grading tasks for educators, provide immediate feedback to students, and offer data-driven insights for teachers to refine their teaching methods or identify students who need extra support.
5. Collaboration and Communication Tools:
   • Platforms that facilitate interaction and group work among students and between students and teachers. This includes video conferencing software (Zoom, Google Meet), online discussion forums, and collaborative document editing tools (Google Docs).
   • Purpose: To support remote learning, foster group projects, and build a sense of community among learners, regardless of their physical location.
6. Gamification:
   • Incorporates game-like elements (points, badges, leaderboards, challenges, rewards) into educational content to increase engagement, motivation, and retention.
   • Purpose: To make learning more enjoyable, competitive, and less intimidating, encouraging persistence and mastery of concepts through playful interaction.
7. AI-Powered Tutors and Chatbots:
   • AI-driven tools that can answer student questions, provide explanations, offer practice problems, and even simulate conversations for language learning or doubt resolution.
   • Purpose: To provide instant, personalized support outside of traditional classroom hours, acting as a scalable supplemental learning aid and reducing the burden on human educators for repetitive queries.

Why EdTech is Essential Today:

• Accessibility: It democratizes education by making quality learning resources available to a wider audience, regardless of geographical location (e.g., benefiting students in Nala Sopara who might not have access to specialized coaching centers or top-tier universities nearby).
• Personalization: It allows for individualized learning paths, catering to diverse learning styles and paces, which is difficult to achieve in a traditional classroom setting.
• Engagement: Through interactive and multimedia-rich content, EdTech can make learning more captivating and effective, combating disinterest often associated with rote learning.
• Efficiency for Educators: Automates administrative tasks, freeing up teachers’ time to focus on instruction and individual student needs.
• Skill Development: Equips learners with essential digital literacy and 21st-century skills crucial for today’s rapidly evolving job market.
• Flexibility: Offers learners the ability to study anytime, anywhere, at their own pace, accommodating varying schedules and commitments.

In summary, EdTech represents the convergence of education and technology, aiming to create more effective, equitable, and engaging learning experiences for everyone involved in the educational process.

Who is Required EdTech?

Courtesy: Simple Explain

EdTech is not a “nice-to-have” anymore; it’s becoming a fundamental requirement for a wide array of individuals, institutions, and even governments in the modern educational landscape. Its necessity stems from the evolving demands of learners, the capabilities of technology, and the global push for accessible, personalized, and efficient education.

Here’s a breakdown of who is required to use or implement EdTech:

1. Students (The Primary Beneficiaries)

• For Enhanced Learning: All students, from K-12 to higher education and lifelong learners, require EdTech for personalized learning paths, interactive content, access to diverse resources, and engaging experiences. This is particularly crucial for students with different learning styles or those who struggle in traditional settings.
• For Accessibility: Students in remote areas (like some parts beyond central Nala Sopara) who lack access to physical schools or quality teachers. Also, students with disabilities who benefit from adaptive technologies and assistive learning tools.
• For Skill Development: To gain digital literacy, computational thinking, and other 21st-century skills essential for future careers.
• For Flexibility: Students who need to learn at their own pace, outside traditional school hours (e.g., working professionals, those with family commitments).
• For Competitive Edge: Students seeking competitive exam preparation or specialized skill acquisition (e.g., coding, data science) often find the best resources and personalized coaching through EdTech platforms.

2. Educators (Teachers, Professors, Trainers)

• For Improved Pedagogy: To enhance teaching methods, create more engaging lessons (using multimedia, gamification), and cater to diverse learning styles.
• For Efficiency: To automate administrative tasks (grading, attendance, record-keeping) using Learning Management Systems (LMS) and assessment tools, freeing up more time for actual teaching and student interaction.
• For Professional Development: To access online courses, webinars, and resources to stay updated on new teaching methodologies, subject matter, and, of course, new EdTech tools themselves.
• For Data-Driven Insights: To track student progress, identify learning gaps, and personalize interventions based on analytics provided by EdTech platforms.
• For Collaboration: To connect with peers, share resources, and collaborate on curriculum development globally.

3. Educational Institutions (Schools, Colleges, Universities, Coaching Centers)

• For Modernization & Competitiveness: To remain relevant and attractive to students and parents who expect digital learning options. Institutions that don’t adopt EdTech risk falling behind.
• For Scalability: To reach a larger number of students without a proportional increase in physical infrastructure.
• For Resource Optimization: To manage administrative tasks more efficiently, reduce costs (e.g., digital textbooks instead of print), and optimize resource allocation.
• For Blended/Hybrid Learning: Many institutions now operate on a blended model, where physical classes are supplemented or enhanced by online components. EdTech is essential for this.
• For Accreditation & Standards: To meet modern educational standards and accreditation requirements, which increasingly include technology integration.
• For Teacher Empowerment: To provide teachers with the tools and training necessary to excel in a digital learning environment.

4. Parents

• For Monitoring Progress: To track their child’s academic performance, engagement, and communicate effectively with teachers through integrated platforms.
• For Supplemental Learning: To provide their children with additional resources, tutoring, or specialized courses beyond what the school offers.
• For Informed Decision-Making: To choose the best educational pathways and resources for their children, often influenced by the EdTech offerings available.

5. Governments & Policymakers

• For Educational Equity & Access: To bridge the digital divide and ensure quality education reaches underserved populations (rural areas, economically disadvantaged students). Initiatives like India’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasize technology integration for this purpose.
• For Skill Development & Workforce Readiness: To align educational outcomes with national economic needs by promoting skills development relevant to the digital age.
• For Crisis Preparedness: To ensure educational continuity during unforeseen events (like pandemics).
• For Data-Driven Policy: To collect and analyze educational data at scale to inform policy decisions and resource allocation.
• For Standardization & Quality Assurance: To set standards for EdTech products and ensure their quality and effectiveness across the system.

6. EdTech Companies & Developers

• For Innovation & Market Growth: This sector is inherently “required” to develop, iterate, and innovate new solutions to meet the evolving needs of the other stakeholders.
• For Bridging Gaps: To provide specialized solutions that address specific learning challenges or market demands.

In summary, EdTech is no longer a niche tool but a critical component for anyone involved in the modern learning ecosystem, from the individual learner in Nala Sopara looking for competitive exam coaching to the government aiming to provide equitable education nationwide. Sources

When is Required EdTech?

Show thinking

“When is EdTech required?” refers to the specific scenarios, conditions, and moments in time where leveraging educational technology becomes essential, highly advantageous, or even the only viable solution for effective teaching and learning.

It’s not about a specific date, but rather the triggers or needs that necessitate its use.

Here are the key “when” scenarios for EdTech:

1. When Physical Access to Education is Limited or Impossible:
   • Scenario: During pandemics (like COVID-19), natural disasters, or in geographically remote areas (such as some villages around Nala Sopara) where physical schools are scarce, overpopulated, or hard to reach.
   • Requirement: EdTech (online learning platforms, virtual classrooms) becomes critical for ensuring educational continuity and access for students who cannot attend physical classes.
2. When Personalized Learning is Needed:
   • Scenario: When a “one-size-fits-all” classroom approach fails to cater to individual student learning paces, styles, strengths, or weaknesses. This applies to gifted students who need acceleration, or struggling students who require remedial support.
   • Requirement: EdTech with adaptive learning algorithms, AI tutors, and individualized content delivery becomes essential to provide tailored educational experiences.
3. When Engaging & Interactive Learning Experiences are Desired:
   • Scenario: To combat disinterest in traditional rote learning, make complex subjects more understandable, or provide immersive experiences not possible in a standard classroom.
   • Requirement: EdTech incorporating gamification, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), interactive simulations, and rich multimedia content is required to boost student engagement and comprehension.
4. When Scaling Education & Reaching Mass Audiences is the Goal:
   • Scenario: For large-scale professional development, upskilling/reskilling initiatives, or providing uniform quality education across a vast population (like India’s).
   • Requirement: EdTech platforms (MOOCs, large-scale online academies) are necessary to deliver content to hundreds of thousands or millions of learners simultaneously, bypassing geographical and infrastructure limitations.
5. When Efficiency and Automation for Educators are Crucial:
   • Scenario: When teachers are burdened by administrative tasks (grading, attendance, record-keeping) or need better ways to track student progress and identify learning gaps.
   • Requirement: EdTech tools like Learning Management Systems (LMS), automated assessment platforms, and analytics dashboards streamline operations, freeing up teachers to focus more on instruction and student interaction.
6. When Preparing Students for a Digital-First World:
   • Scenario: In an increasingly digitized global economy, students need to be equipped with digital literacy, computational thinking, and technology-fluency skills.
   • Requirement: EdTech integration from an early age is vital to familiarize students with digital tools, online collaboration, and responsible technology use.
7. During the Upskilling and Reskilling of the Workforce:
   • Scenario: As industries evolve rapidly, professionals constantly need to acquire new skills or refresh existing ones to remain competitive in the job market.
   • Requirement: Online learning platforms, certification courses, and micro-credentialing programs enabled by EdTech provide flexible and accessible pathways for lifelong learning and professional development.
8. When Data-Driven Educational Insights are Needed:
   • Scenario: For educators, administrators, or policymakers who need granular data on learning outcomes, curriculum effectiveness, and student engagement to make informed decisions.
   • Requirement: EdTech platforms with robust analytics capabilities are essential for collecting, processing, and visualizing this data.

In essence, EdTech is required whenever the limitations of traditional education become apparent, whenever new opportunities for more effective and accessible learning arise, and whenever the world demands a technologically proficient and adaptable workforce. It’s not a luxury, but an increasingly fundamental tool for the future of education. Sources

Where is Required EdTech?

Where is EdTech required?” refers to the specific environments, sectors, and geographical locations where educational technology is becoming indispensable for learning, teaching, and administrative functions. It’s not limited to a single place but is permeating nearly every facet of education.

Here’s a breakdown of where EdTech is required:

1. Educational Institutions (Across All Levels)

• K-12 Schools (Primary and Secondary):
  • Classrooms: For interactive whiteboards, digital textbooks, educational apps, gamified learning, and formative assessments.
  • Computer Labs: For digital literacy training, coding classes, and online research.
  • Administration: For Learning Management Systems (LMS), Student Information Systems (SIS) to manage student data, attendance, grades, and communication with parents.
  • Libraries: For digital libraries, e-books, and online research databases.
• Higher Education (Colleges and Universities):
  • Lecture Halls: For multimedia presentations, live streaming of lectures, and interactive polling.
  • Online/Hybrid Programs: Crucial for distance learning degrees, blended courses, and MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) where students learn partially or entirely online.
  • Research Labs: For simulations, data analysis tools, and collaborative research platforms.
  • Student Services: For online registration, academic advising, career services, and virtual campus tours.
• Vocational Training & Skill Development Centers:
  • For delivering specialized courses, practical simulations, and certifications in fields like IT, data science, digital marketing, healthcare, and trades.
  • Example: A vocational training center in Nala Sopara using online modules for basic coding skills or simulated scenarios for plumbing or electrical work.

2. Homes & Individual Learning Spaces

• Self-Paced Learning: Students often use EdTech at home for homework, self-study, exam preparation (e.g., JEE/NEET coaching via apps), and to explore subjects beyond the curriculum.
• Remote Learning: For students who are homeschooled, sick, or live far from physical institutions, home-based EdTech provides continuity and access to education.
• Parental Involvement: Parents use EdTech apps to monitor their children’s progress, access learning materials, and communicate with teachers.
• Lifelong Learning: Adults use EdTech platforms for continuous professional development, learning new hobbies, or acquiring new skills relevant to their careers (e.g., upskilling for a promotion).

3. Corporate & Professional Environments

• Employee Training & Development: Companies use EdTech for onboarding new employees, compliance training, skill enhancement programs, and leadership development.
• E-learning Modules: Internal LMS platforms for delivering mandatory training, product knowledge, and sales training to employees globally.
• Certifications & Upskilling: Many professionals seek external EdTech platforms to gain certifications in emerging technologies or management skills to stay competitive.

4. Geographical Contexts

• Urban Areas (e.g., Mumbai, Pune): EdTech is required for advanced learning, access to specialized courses, competitive exam preparation, and the convenience of quick commerce models in education. Urban schools often have better infrastructure (high-speed internet, devices) for rapid EdTech adoption.
• Tier 2/3 Cities & Rural Areas (e.g., Nala Sopara and surrounding regions): This is where EdTech plays a transformative and often critical role in bridging the educational gap.
  • Access to Quality Education: EdTech provides access to expert teachers and quality content that might not be available locally due to teacher shortages or lack of infrastructure. This is a significant factor in addressing educational inequality across India.
  • Localized Content: Growing demand for EdTech in regional languages (like Marathi in Maharashtra) makes it more accessible and effective for students in these areas.
  • Connectivity Challenges: While a challenge, solutions like offline content modes in apps and government initiatives to boost rural internet penetration make EdTech increasingly viable even in less connected regions.
  • Skill Development: EdTech offers pathways for students in these areas to gain skills relevant to broader job markets, improving their employability.

5. Government and Public Sector

• Policy Implementation: Governments require EdTech to implement national educational policies (like India’s NEP 2020), standardize curriculum delivery, and monitor educational outcomes across states and districts.
• Mass Education Initiatives: Platforms like India’s SWAYAM and DIKSHA are government-backed EdTech initiatives required to provide free online courses and digital content to millions of students.
• Teacher Training: EdTech is used to train and upskill teachers across vast geographical areas, especially to equip them with digital pedagogical skills.

How is Required EdTech?

Here’s how EdTech is required to function and deliver its benefits:

I. Through Technological Infrastructure & Tools:

1. Reliable Internet Connectivity & Devices:
   • How it’s required: EdTech fundamentally relies on access to the internet (broadband, mobile data) and devices (smartphones, tablets, laptops, desktops). Without this foundational infrastructure, most EdTech solutions are unusable. This is a key challenge in bridging the digital divide in areas like Nala Sopara.
   • Practical application: Students need internet to access online lessons, submit assignments; teachers need it for virtual classrooms and managing content.
2. Learning Management Systems (LMS):
   • How it’s required: As the central hub for online and blended learning. An LMS organizes courses, hosts content, facilitates communication, manages assignments, and tracks student progress.
   • Practical application: Schools and universities use LMS platforms (e.g., Google Classroom, Canvas, Moodle) to deliver entire curricula, manage student enrollment, and communicate effectively.
3. Specialized EdTech Software & Apps:
   • How it’s required: For specific learning needs and interactive experiences. This includes:
     • Adaptive Learning Software: Personalizes content and pace based on individual student performance.
     • Gamified Learning Apps: Integrate game elements (points, badges, leaderboards) to increase engagement (e.g., Kahoot!, Duolingo).
     • Virtual/Augmented Reality (VR/AR) Tools: Provide immersive experiences for complex subjects (e.g., virtual labs, historical reconstructions).
     • AI-powered Tutors/Chatbots: Offer instant assistance, doubt resolution, and personalized feedback.
   • Practical application: A student uses an adaptive math app to work at their own speed; a science class uses a VR app to explore the human body.
4. Content Management Systems (CMS) & Digital Content:
   • How it’s required: For creating, organizing, and delivering multimedia-rich educational content (e-books, video lectures, interactive quizzes, simulations).
   • Practical application: Publishers and educators use CMS to produce digital textbooks, interactive lesson plans, and educational videos accessible on various devices.
5. Assessment & Analytics Tools:
   • How it’s required: To monitor student progress, provide immediate feedback, and generate data-driven insights for educators.
   • Practical application: Online quizzes for automated grading, performance dashboards for teachers to identify struggling students, and tools for formative assessments.

II. Through Implementation Strategies & Pedagogical Shifts:

1. Professional Development & Teacher Training:
   • How it’s required: EdTech is only as effective as the educators using it. Teachers need training not just on how to operate the tools, but how to integrate them pedagogically to enhance learning outcomes.
   • Practical application: Workshops on using interactive whiteboards, webinars on leveraging AI tools for personalized assignments, and ongoing support for new software.
2. Integration into Curriculum & Pedagogy:
   • How it’s required: EdTech should not just be an add-on, but meaningfully integrated into the curriculum to support learning objectives, not just for technology’s sake.
   • Practical application: Flipped classrooms (students watch lectures online at home, do practice in class), project-based learning using collaborative online tools, or hybrid models combining in-person and online components.
3. Data-Driven Decision Making:
   • How it’s required: EdTech platforms generate vast amounts of data on student engagement, performance, and learning patterns. Utilizing this data is crucial for optimizing learning.
   • Practical application: Analyzing student performance data to identify areas where the curriculum needs adjustment, personalizing interventions for at-risk students, and refining teaching strategies.
4. Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Protocols:
   • How it’s required: Given the sensitive nature of student data, robust cybersecurity measures and strict adherence to data privacy regulations (like India’s upcoming data protection laws) are paramount.
   • Practical application: Implementing secure logins, data encryption, clear privacy policies, and educating users on online safety.
5. Focus on Accessibility & Inclusivity:
   • How it’s required: EdTech must be designed to be accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities or those facing socio-economic barriers.
   • Practical application: Providing assistive technologies (screen readers, speech-to-text), multi-lingual content (especially important in India’s diverse linguistic landscape), and low-bandwidth options for areas with limited connectivity.

In essence, EdTech is required to transform education by being strategically deployed and effectively integrated using appropriate tools and thoughtful pedagogical approaches, all while ensuring accessibility, security, and a focus on improving learning outcomes for every student.

Case study on EdTech?

Courtesy: CNBC-TV18

EdTech Case Study: BYJU’S – India’s EdTech Unicorn and Its Tumultuous Journey

1. Company Overview:

• Name: BYJU’S (Think and Learn Private Limited)
• Founders: Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath
• Founded: 2011 (The BYJU’S Learning App launched in 2015)
• Headquarters: Bengaluru, India
• Initial Vision: To make learning fun, engaging, and personalized through technology, initially focusing on K-12 students and competitive exam preparation.

2. The Problem BYJU’S Aimed to Solve in Indian Education:

Traditional Indian education, for many years, has faced several challenges:

• Rote Learning: Emphasis on memorization rather than conceptual understanding.
• Lack of Personalization: Large class sizes, limiting individualized attention.
• Unequal Access to Quality Teaching: Disparity in teacher quality and resources, especially between urban and rural areas (relevant to students in and around Nala Sopara).
• Engagement Deficit: Text-heavy, less interactive learning methods leading to student disinterest.
• Competitive Pressure: Intense pressure for competitive exams (JEE, NEET, UPSC), driving demand for supplementary coaching.

3. BYJU’S Solution & Business Model (The “Rise”):

BYJU’S initially rose to prominence by addressing these pain points with a compelling solution:

• Interactive Video Content: Transformed complex topics into engaging, visually rich animated video lessons, making learning more palatable and understandable.
• Personalized Learning Paths (Adaptive Learning): Leveraged AI and algorithms to assess student strengths and weaknesses, then tailor learning content and practice exercises to individual needs and pace.
• Freemium Model: Offered free access to basic content (e.g., initial chapters, demo classes) to attract a large user base, then converted them to paid subscribers for premium content and full courses.
• Proprietary Tablets: Initially, many subscriptions came with pre-loaded educational content on BYJU’S branded tablets.
• Wide Range of Offerings: Expanded beyond K-12 to competitive exam preparation (JEE, NEET, CAT, IAS), and later into early learning programs.
• Aggressive Marketing: Employed celebrity endorsements (e.g., Shah Rukh Khan) and extensive advertising campaigns to build strong brand recognition across India.
• Strategic Acquisitions: A key part of their rapid expansion strategy was acquiring other EdTech companies and traditional coaching institutes, significantly expanding their content library, user base, and market segments. Notable acquisitions include:
  • Aakash Educational Services: A large chain of offline test-prep centers, signaling a move towards a “phygital” (physical + digital) hybrid model.
  • WhiteHat Jr.: A coding platform for children.
  • Great Learning: Focused on professional upskilling and higher education.
  • Epic!: A U.S.-based digital library for children.

4. Impact & Successes (The Peak):

• Market Dominance: Became India’s most valuable EdTech company and, at its peak, one of the world’s most valuable EdTech unicorns (reaching a valuation of $22 billion).
• Massive User Base: Attracted over 150 million registered students and millions of paid subscribers.
• Revolutionized Learning: Made digital learning a mainstream concept in India, influencing how students prepared for exams and supplemented school education, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Accessibility (Limited): While primarily targeting the urban and semi-urban middle class, its digital nature offered accessibility beyond tier-1 cities. Initiatives like “Education for All” aimed to provide free access to underprivileged children.
• Investor Confidence: Attracted significant investments from global venture capital firms like Sequoia Capital, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Tencent, and BlackRock.

5. Challenges & Downfall (The “Fall”):

BYJU’S experienced a dramatic decline from its peak, facing a multitude of challenges:

• High Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC): The aggressive marketing campaigns, while successful in brand building, led to unsustainable CACs that outpaced revenue generation.
• Aggressive Sales Tactics & Customer Dissatisfaction: Widespread complaints emerged regarding high-pressure sales, misrepresentation, and alleged exploitation of customer vulnerabilities, leading to reputational damage and customer churn. This was a significant concern for parents, including those in regions like Nala Sopara where trust and value for money are paramount.
• Post-Pandemic Reopening: As schools reopened, the surge in demand for online learning subsided, impacting subscription renewals and new acquisitions.
• Financial Mismanagement & Lack of Transparency:
  • Delayed Financial Results: Significant delays in filing audited financial results raised red flags for investors.
  • Mounting Debt: The rapid acquisition spree, often at high valuations, combined with high operational costs, led to a substantial debt burden.
  • Auditor Resignations: The resignation of its auditor (Deloitte) and key board members signaled deep governance issues.
• Integration Challenges: Integrating numerous acquired companies with disparate cultures, technologies, and business models proved difficult, leading to operational inefficiencies.
• Legal & Regulatory Scrutiny: Faced various lawsuits, regulatory probes (e.g., by the Enforcement Directorate in India), and public backlash over its practices.
• Valuation Decline: Its valuation plummeted from $22 billion to a fraction of that, reflecting investor skepticism and financial distress.
• Mass Layoffs & Employee Morale: To cut costs, BYJU’S underwent multiple rounds of mass layoffs, leading to low employee morale and further negative press.

6. Current Situation & Future Outlook:

BYJU’S is currently in a restructuring phase, attempting to address its financial woes and regain trust. Its founder, Byju Raveendran, has admitted mistakes and expressed a renewed focus on profitability, sustainability, and returning to the core mission. There’s talk of “BYJU’S 3.0” focusing on a lean, sustainable, and classroom-centric hybrid model.

7. Lessons Learned from the BYJU’S Case Study:

• Sustainable Growth is Paramount: Rapid expansion through acquisitions and high marketing spend is not sustainable without robust underlying profitability and unit economics.
• Ethical Business Practices Build Trust: Aggressive sales tactics and lack of transparency can severely damage brand reputation and lead to long-term customer attrition.
• Strong Corporate Governance is Critical: Transparent financial reporting, independent board oversight, and clear accountability structures are essential for investor confidence and long-term viability.
• Adaptability to Market Shifts: The EdTech boom during the pandemic was temporary; companies must adapt to changing market dynamics (e.g., schools reopening, hybrid learning preferences).
• Customer Retention is Key: Beyond customer acquisition, focusing on product quality, learning outcomes, and customer satisfaction is crucial for subscription-based models.
• Focus on Core Value Proposition: While diversification can be good, losing sight of the core educational value proposition for aggressive sales can be detrimental.

BYJU’S serves as a significant learning example in the EdTech space, illustrating the incredible potential for digital transformation in education, but also the critical importance of sustainable business practices, ethical operations, and strong governance.

White paper on EdTech?

---

White Paper: Navigating the Future of Learning – Strategies for Sustainable EdTech Integration in India

---

Abstract

The Indian education landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, with Educational Technology (EdTech) emerging as a pivotal force. This white paper provides a comprehensive overview of EdTech’s current state, its benefits, and the critical challenges it faces in India. We delve into key trends shaping the sector, including the pervasive influence of Artificial Intelligence, the rise of hybrid learning models, and the crucial imperative of digital equity. With insights tailored to the unique complexities of a diverse nation, this paper offers strategic recommendations for stakeholders – educators, institutions, policymakers, and EdTech providers – to foster a sustainable, inclusive, and impactful EdTech ecosystem, ultimately shaping a future-ready workforce for India.

---

1. Introduction: The Dawn of a New Era in Indian Education

• 1.1. Defining EdTech: EdTech encompasses the application of technology to enhance teaching and learning outcomes, ranging from digital learning platforms and interactive content to AI-powered tutors and immersive learning experiences. It aims to make education more accessible, personalized, engaging, and efficient.
• 1.2. India’s EdTech Imperative: With the world’s largest youth population (over 600 million under 25) and a burgeoning digital economy, India stands at a critical juncture. Traditional education models, often characterized by rote learning and limited access to quality instruction, face an urgent need for modernization. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 strongly advocates for technology integration, signaling a national commitment to leveraging EdTech for holistic development and skill-oriented learning.
• 1.3. Post-Pandemic Trajectory: The COVID-19 pandemic served as an unprecedented accelerator for EdTech adoption in India, making online learning mainstream. While the initial surge has stabilized, the experience cemented technology’s indispensable role in educational continuity and innovation. The Indian EdTech market is projected to reach $29-30 billion by 2030, reflecting a sustained growth trajectory despite recent market corrections.
• 1.4. Purpose of this White Paper: This document seeks to analyze the current state, emerging trends, opportunities, and challenges within the Indian EdTech sector, offering actionable strategies for its responsible and impactful growth.

---

2. The Multi-Faceted Benefits of EdTech in the Indian Context

• 2.1. Enhancing Accessibility & Equity:
  • Bridging Geographical Gaps: EdTech enables students in remote and rural areas, often underserved by quality physical infrastructure (e.g., villages near Nala Sopara), to access expert teachers and diverse learning resources.
  • Overcoming Teacher Shortages: Online platforms can help mitigate the impact of teacher shortages, particularly in specialized subjects, by making high-quality instruction available virtually.
  • Affordability: While some EdTech can be expensive, many platforms offer more cost-effective learning solutions compared to traditional coaching, especially with scalable digital content.
• 2.2. Fostering Personalized & Adaptive Learning:
  • EdTech leverages AI and analytics to create customized learning paths, allowing students to progress at their own pace, revisit difficult concepts, and receive targeted feedback. This is crucial in addressing varied learning needs within large classrooms.
• 2.3. Boosting Engagement & Retention:
  • Interactive content, gamification, multimedia presentations, and virtual labs transform passive learning into active, immersive experiences, leading to better comprehension and retention.
• 2.4. Developing Future-Ready Skills:
  • EdTech platforms are at the forefront of imparting 21st-century skills like critical thinking, problem-solving, digital literacy, coding, and AI literacy, which are essential for India’s young workforce to thrive in a global economy.
• 2.5. Empowering Educators & Streamlining Administration:
  • LMS and assessment tools automate administrative tasks, freeing up teachers’ time. EdTech also provides valuable data insights into student performance, enabling more informed pedagogical decisions and professional development.

---

3. Key Trends and Innovations Shaping Indian EdTech (2025 Outlook)

• 3.1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI:
  • Personalized Tutors: AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants provide 24/7 doubt resolution, personalized explanations, and practice questions in multiple languages, including regional Indian languages.
  • Content Creation & Curation: GenAI assists educators in swiftly creating diverse learning materials, quizzes, and even personalized assignments, reducing content development time.
  • Intelligent Assessment: AI automates grading for subjective answers, provides detailed feedback, and identifies learning patterns, going beyond simple right/wrong answers.
  • Adaptive Learning: AI continuously analyzes student performance to adapt the curriculum’s pace and difficulty.
• 3.2. Hybrid Learning Models (Phygital):
  • The market is moving away from purely online models towards a blend of online and offline learning. This involves physical coaching centers integrating digital content, online platforms setting up offline touchpoints, and smart classrooms equipped with EdTech tools.
  • Significance: This model addresses the need for human interaction and structured environments that many Indian learners and parents still prefer.
• 3.3. Vernacular Content & Regional Language Focus:
  • Given India’s linguistic diversity, there’s an increasing demand for EdTech content and platforms in regional languages (e.g., Marathi for students in Nala Sopara). This significantly expands market reach beyond English-speaking populations.
• 3.4. Skill-Based Learning & Professional Upskilling:
  • A major driver of EdTech growth is the focus on employability. Platforms offering industry-specific courses, certifications, and vocational training are in high demand to bridge the skill gap between academia and industry.
• 3.5. Gamification & Immersive Learning (AR/VR):
  • The integration of game-like elements is enhancing engagement, particularly in K-12. Investments in AR/VR are leading to more immersive learning experiences, such as virtual lab experiments and 3D historical recreations.
• 3.6. Blockchain for Credentialing:
  • Emerging use of blockchain to create secure, verifiable, and tamper-proof digital certificates and academic credentials, enhancing trust and portability of qualifications.

---

4. Navigating the Challenges: The Road to Sustainable Growth

• 4.1. Digital Divide & Infrastructure Gaps:
  • Challenge: Uneven internet penetration (especially in rural India) and affordability of smart devices remain significant barriers to universal EdTech access.
  • Impact: Perpetuates educational inequality and limits the reach of online learning.
• 4.2. Quality, Pedagogy, and Engagement:
  • Challenge: Concerns about the pedagogical effectiveness of some online content, low course completion rates, and the quality of online instruction. Lack of human interaction can reduce engagement for some learners.
  • Impact: Can lead to a disconnect between technology and meaningful learning outcomes.
• 4.3. Business Model Sustainability & Profitability:
  • Challenge: High customer acquisition costs, aggressive discounting, and investor pressure often lead to unsustainable business models. Recent major company struggles (e.g., BYJU’S) highlight these issues.
  • Impact: Leads to market consolidation, layoffs, and investor skepticism.
• 4.4. Regulatory & Ethical Concerns:
  • Challenge: The absence of a comprehensive, clear regulatory framework for EdTech in India. This includes issues like:
    • Data Privacy & Security: Protection of sensitive student data, especially with AI integration.
    • Misleading Advertising & Sales Practices: Aggressive sales tactics and unsubstantiated claims by some players.
    • Content Authenticity & Quality Control: Ensuring accuracy and pedagogical soundness of digital learning materials.
    • Screen Time & Student Well-being: Concerns about excessive screen exposure and its impact on mental and physical health.
  • Impact: Erodes trust among parents and students, and creates an uneven playing field.
• 4.5. Teacher Training & Adoption:
  • Challenge: Many educators lack adequate training in digital pedagogy and effective integration of EdTech tools into their teaching. Resistance to change can hinder adoption.
  • Impact: Limits the true potential of EdTech if teachers are not equipped to use it effectively.
• 4.6. Assessment & Recognition of Online Learning:
  • Challenge: Acceptance of online certifications and degrees by employers, particularly in traditional sectors.
  • Impact: Creates uncertainty for learners investing in online education for career advancement.

---

5. Strategic Recommendations for a Sustainable EdTech Ecosystem

• 5.1. Policy & Regulatory Clarity:
  • Government Role: Develop a robust, clear, and comprehensive regulatory framework that balances innovation with consumer protection. This includes guidelines for data privacy, advertising standards, content quality, and fee structures.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations for infrastructure development (e.g., universal affordable broadband), content creation, and teacher training.
• 5.2. Focus on Pedagogical Efficacy & Outcomes:
  • EdTech Providers: Prioritize learning outcomes over sales metrics. Invest in research-backed pedagogical models, ensuring content is not just engaging but also effective.
  • Institutions: Integrate EdTech strategically into the curriculum, providing professional development for educators to effectively leverage tools for enhanced teaching.
• 5.3. Ethical Practices & Transparency:
  • Industry: Adopt a self-regulatory code of conduct regarding sales tactics, pricing, data handling, and advertising claims. Build trust through transparency.
  • Consumers: Increase awareness among parents and students about digital rights and how to evaluate EdTech offerings.
• 5.4. Enhance Accessibility & Inclusivity:
  • Government & Industry: Accelerate efforts to bridge the digital divide through affordable internet, low-cost devices, and subsidized access to quality EdTech.
  • Content Localization: Prioritize creation of high-quality content in all major Indian languages to reach a broader audience.
  • Universal Design: Develop platforms and content that are accessible to learners with diverse abilities.
• 5.5. Promote Hybrid Models:
  • Encourage the development of “phygital” learning centers that combine the best of online flexibility with the structure and social interaction of offline environments.
• 5.6. Invest in Teacher Training & Empowerment:
  • Implement large-scale, ongoing professional development programs for educators on digital literacy, blended learning methodologies, and effective use of EdTech tools. Make them partners in the EdTech journey.
• 5.7. Bridge the Skill-Employment Gap:
  • Foster stronger collaboration between EdTech companies, industries, and academic institutions to ensure course content is aligned with workforce demands and certifications are recognized by employers.

---

6. Conclusion: A Transformative Journey Ahead

EdTech in India is at an inflection point. While it has demonstrated immense potential for democratizing education, personalizing learning, and equipping a future-ready workforce, its sustainable growth hinges on addressing critical challenges related to access, quality, ethics, and business models. By fostering strong partnerships between government, educational institutions, and EdTech innovators, prioritizing pedagogical excellence, ethical conduct, and digital equity, India can harness the true power of educational technology to build an inclusive, effective, and resilient learning ecosystem that empowers every learner, from the bustling cities to the remotest villages. The future of learning in India is undeniably digital, but its success will be measured by its ability to create equitable and meaningful educational outcomes for all.

---

References

• [Cite key reports, government policies (e.g., NEP 2020), industry analyses (e.g., from RedSeer, IAMAI, Inc42, ET Education, EY India), and academic papers.]

---

About the Author/Organization

[Brief description of your expertise, background, or the organization’s mission related to education or technology.]

Industrial Application of EdTech?

I’ll generate a tool_code block to get the most up-to-date information on the industrial applications of EdTech. EdTech, traditionally associated with K-12 and higher education, is rapidly expanding its footprint into the industrial sector, revolutionizing how businesses train their workforce, manage knowledge, and ensure continuous skill development. This is crucial for industries facing rapid technological advancements, automation, and the need for a highly skilled and adaptable workforce.

Here are the key industrial applications of EdTech:

1. Corporate Training & Employee Onboarding

• Customized Learning Paths: Companies use EdTech platforms (Learning Management Systems – LMS) to deliver tailored training modules for new hires, product knowledge, sales training, compliance, and soft skills development.
  • Application: A manufacturing plant in Maharashtra onboarding new factory workers through interactive e-learning modules that cover safety protocols, machinery operation, and company policies before they even step onto the shop floor.
• Scalable & Consistent Training: EdTech ensures that all employees, regardless of their location (e.g., from corporate offices in Mumbai to field offices in rural areas), receive consistent and high-quality training.
  • Application: A multinational IT firm providing standardized cybersecurity training to all its employees across different global offices via online courses and quizzes.

2. Workforce Upskilling & Reskilling

• Addressing the Skills Gap: Industries are facing a critical skills gap, especially in areas like AI, data science, automation, and advanced manufacturing. EdTech provides agile solutions for upskilling the existing workforce.
  • Application: Employees at an automotive company learning new skills in electric vehicle technology or robotic process automation through online certification programs offered by platforms like Coursera, UpGrad, or Simplilearn, often with industry-recognized credentials.
• Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Many industrial roles require continuous learning due to evolving technologies and regulations. EdTech facilitates this ongoing development.
  • Application: Healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses) accessing online medical journals, virtual case studies, and micro-learning modules to stay updated on new procedures, drug interactions, and best practices.

3. Specialized Technical & Vocational Training

• Virtual Labs & Simulations (AR/VR): For complex or hazardous industrial tasks, AR/VR provides a safe and immersive environment for training.
  • Application:
    • Manufacturing: Engineers practicing maintenance procedures on a virtual replica of a complex machine, learning how to troubleshoot issues without risking damage to actual equipment.
    • Healthcare: Surgeons practicing intricate operations in a VR environment before performing them on real patients; medical students conducting virtual dissections or learning anatomy through AR overlays.
    • Energy Sector: Technicians training on high-voltage equipment or oil rig operations in simulated environments.
• Digital Twins for Training: Creating virtual models of physical systems (e.g., a factory floor or a power plant) allows for simulated training scenarios.
  • Application: Training maintenance teams on how a specific part of a factory’s production line operates and how to repair it, using a digital twin before physically interacting with the machinery.
• Industrial IoT (IIoT) & Data Analytics Training: Teaching employees how to work with smart factories, predictive maintenance, and big data generated by industrial operations.
  • Application: L&T EduTech offering courses on “Digital Technology in Manufacturing” which cover topics like Product Lifecycle Management, ERP, Value Chain Management, and IIoT, helping employees understand and implement smart factory concepts.

4. Safety & Compliance Training

• Interactive Safety Modules: Delivering critical safety information, emergency procedures, and regulatory compliance training through engaging videos, quizzes, and simulations.
  • Application: Construction workers completing mandatory safety training modules online, including simulations of potential hazards and correct safety equipment usage. This can be tracked via an LMS to ensure compliance.
• Certification & Retraining: EdTech platforms can manage certifications, remind employees of renewal dates, and provide the necessary retraining modules.

5. Sales & Customer Service Training

• Product Knowledge & Sales Simulations: Training sales teams on complex industrial products, their specifications, benefits, and how to address customer objections through interactive modules and role-playing simulations.
• Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Training: Teaching employees how to use CRM software and best practices for customer interaction.

6. Knowledge Management & Documentation

• Centralized Knowledge Hubs: EdTech platforms serve as repositories for all company knowledge, documentation, training materials, and best practices, making it easily accessible to employees.
• Microlearning: Breaking down complex industrial concepts into bite-sized, easily digestible modules that employees can access on-demand, often on mobile devices.
  • Application: A field technician troubleshooting equipment by quickly accessing a short video tutorial or a step-by-step guide on their smartphone.

Benefits of EdTech in Industrial Applications:

• Reduced Costs: Lowers expenses associated with traditional classroom training (travel, instructors, physical materials).
• Increased Efficiency: Automates training delivery, tracks progress, and reduces training time.
• Enhanced Safety: Provides risk-free environments for practicing dangerous procedures.
• Improved Skill Development: Delivers targeted, personalized learning that directly addresses industry-specific skill gaps.
• Higher Engagement & Retention: Interactive, multimedia-rich content and gamification lead to better learning outcomes.
• Flexibility & Accessibility: Training can be accessed anytime, anywhere, accommodating shift work and diverse geographical locations.
• Data-Driven Insights: Provides analytics on training effectiveness, individual performance, and areas needing improvement.

For industries in and around Nala Sopara, adopting EdTech means they can train their workforce more efficiently, upskill them in advanced manufacturing techniques, ensure compliance with safety standards, and ultimately enhance productivity and competitiveness in the rapidly evolving industrial landscape.

References

[edit]

1. ^ Robinson, Rhonda; Molenda, Michael; Rezabek, Landra. “Facilitating Learning” (PDF). Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2016.
2. ^ Mastellos, Nikolaos; Tran, Tammy; Dharmayat, Kanika; Cecil, Elizabeth; Lee, Hsin-Yi; Wong, Cybele C. Peng; Mkandawire, Winnie; Ngalande, Emmanuel; Wu, Joseph Tsung-Shu; Hardy, Victoria; Chirambo, Baxter Griphin (2 April 2018). “Training community healthcare workers on the use of information and communication technologies: a randomised controlled trial of traditional versus blended learning in Malawi, Africa”. BMC Medical Education. 18 (1): 61. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1175-5. ISSN 1472-6920. PMC 5879741. PMID 29609596.
3. ^ Jump up to:^a b Tanner Mirrlees; Shahid Alvi (2019). EdTech Inc.: Selling, Automating and Globalizing Higher Education in the Digital Age. New York: Routledge. p. 60. doi:10.4324/9780429343940. ISBN 978-0-429-34394-0. S2CID 211780225.
4. ^ Woo, Stu (30 January 2017). “What’s Better in the Classroom – Teacher or Machine?”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
5. ^ “To win post-pandemic, edtech needs to start thinking big”. TechCrunch. 22 December 2020. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
6. ^ Committee for Draft National Education Policy (2018). Draft National Education Policy 2019 (PDF) (Report). Government of India.
7. ^ Richey, R.C. (2008). “Reflections on the 2008 AECT Definitions of the Field”. TechTrends. 52 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 24–25. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0108-2. ISSN 8756-3894. S2CID 189912472.
8. ^ D. Randy Garrison; Terry Anderson; Definitions and Terminology Committee (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-26346-7. Archived from the original on 14 August 2021.
9. ^ Al Januszewski A.; Molenda Michael. (2007) Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary ISBN 978-0-8058-5861-7
10. ^ Lowenthal, P. R.; Wilson, B. G. (2010). “Labels do matter! A critique of AECT’s redefinition of the field”. TechTrends. 54 (1): 38–46. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.408.648. doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0362-y. S2CID 143977728.
11. ^ Report by Tech.Ed.Gov (2017). NETP17.
12. ^ Herold, Benjamin (5 February 2016). “Technology in Education: An Overview”. Education Week. Archived from the original on 1 November 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
13. ^ Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: AECT.
14. ^ Geng, F. (2014). “Confusing terminologies: #e-learning, learning technologist, educational technologist,…discussed by @A_L_T members”. Oxford, UK. Archived from the original on 5 August 2018.
15. ^ Selwyn, N. (2011), Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, London: Continuum International Publishing Group
16. ^ Day, R; Payne, L (1987). “Computer-managed instruction: an alternative teaching strategy”. Journal of Nursing Education. 26 (1): 30–36. doi:10.3928/0148-4834-19870101-08. ISSN 0148-4834. PMID 3029349.
17. ^ “What is Digital Education?”. Institute for Academic Development. University of Edinburgh. 2024. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Moore, J. L.; Dickson-Deane, C.; Galyen, K. (2011). “E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?”. The Internet and Higher Education. 14 (2): 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001. S2CID 17622901.
19. ^ Singh, V; Thurman, A (2019). “How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988–2018)”. American Journal of Distance Education. 33 (4): 289–306. doi:10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082.
20. ^ “Universities Use Second Life to Teach Complex Concepts”. Government Technology. 27 July 2010. Archived from the original on 4 October 2013. Retrieved 3 October 2013.
21. ^ “DoD gives PTSD help ‘second life’ in virtual reality | Article”. Army.mil. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
22. ^ Malegam, F (13 December 2022). “How to Empower eLearning with Virtual Classrooms in WordPress?”. Adobe.
23. ^ Jump up to:^a b J. Bransford; A. Brown; R. R. Cocking, eds. (2000). “Technology to support learning”. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. pp. 206–230.
24. ^ Alsheail, Abdulrahman (2010). Teaching English as a Second/Foreign Language in a Ubiquitous Learning Environment: A Guide for ESL/EFL Instructors (PDF). (Master’s Project). Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
25. ^ Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework, and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–14.
26. ^ Kinshuk; Chen, Nian-Shing; Cheng, I-Ling; Chew, Sie Wai (17 February 2016). “Evolution Is not enough: Revolutionizing Current Learning Environments to Smart Learning Environments”. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 26 (2): 561–581. doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0108-x. S2CID 11084070.
27. ^ Spector, Jonathan Michael (16 October 2014). “Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments”. Smart Learning Environments. 1 (1). doi:10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7. S2CID 3745158.
28. ^ Andone, Diana; Holotescu, Carmen; Grosseck, Gabriela (2014). 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL). pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/ICWOAL.2014.7009244. ISBN 978-1-4799-5739-2. S2CID 15404201.
29. ^ Lombardi, Patrizia; Giordano, Silvia; Farouh, Hend; Yousef, Wael (June 2012). “Modelling the smart city performance”. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 25 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1080/13511610.2012.660325. S2CID 155017799.
30. ^ Molenda, M. (2008). “Historical foundations”. In M. J. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (Third., pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
31. ^ Nye, D. (2007). Technology Matters: Questions to Live With. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
32. ^ Biruni, Muhammad ibn Ahmad; Sachau, Eduard (1910). Alberuni’s India. An account of the religion, philosophy, literature, geography, chronology, astronomy, customs, laws, and astrology of India about A.D. 1030. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
33. ^ Saettler, P. (1990). The Evolution of American Educational Technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
34. ^ Suppes, P.; Jerman, M.; Groen, G. (1966). “Arithmetic drills and review on a computer-based teletype” (PDF). The Arithmetic Teacher. 13 (4): 303–309. doi:10.5951/AT.13.4.0303. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 4 September 2015.
35. ^ Suppes, P. (19 May 1971). Computer Assisted Instruction at Stanford (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 July 2010. Retrieved 4 September 2015.
36. ^ See Rowan, Roy (1983). Executive Ed. at Computer U. Fortune, 7 March 1983; Feenberg, Andrew (1993). “Building a Global Network: The WBSI Experience”, in L. Harasim, ed., Global Networks: Computerizing the International Community, MIT Press, pp. 185–197.
37. ^ Withrow, Frank (1 June 1997). “Technology in Education and the Next Twenty-Five Years”. T.H.E. Journal.
38. ^ Ray Percival (28 November 1995). “Carry on learning”. New Scientist.
39. ^ Gail S. Thomas (1 February 1988). “Connected Education, Inc”. Netweaver. Electronic Networking Association. Archived from the original on 27 August 2008. Retrieved 25 August 2008.
40. ^ “Promises and pitfalls of online education”. 9 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 June 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
41. ^ Hickey, Ryan (12 May 2014). “The history of online education”. Peterson’s. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
42. ^ Hiltz, S. (1990). “Evaluating the Virtual Classroom”. In Harasim, L. (ed.) Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment. New York: Praeger, pp. 133–169.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Mason. R. and Kaye, A. (1989). Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
44. ^ Avis, Peter (9 October 2014). “1973–1977 The National Development Programme NDPCAL”. Educational Technology. Archived from the original on 6 January 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
45. ^ Crow, W. B. & Din, H. (2009). Unbound By Place or Time: Museums and Online Learning. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums, 9–10.
46. ^ Bates, A. (2005). Technology, e-Learning and Distance Education. London: Routledge.
47. ^ Jump up to:^a b Johnson, Henry M (2007). “Dialogue and the construction of knowledge in e-learning: Exploring students’ perceptions of their learning while using Blackboard’s asynchronous discussion board”. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 10 (1). Archived from the original on 16 November 2012. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
48. ^ Harasim, L., Hiltz, S., Teles, L. and Turoff, M. (1995). Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. ^ Graziadei, W. D., et al., 1997. Building Asynchronous and Synchronous Teaching-Learning Environments: Exploring a Course/Classroom Management System Solution Archived 13 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine.
50. ^ “National Center for Education Statistics” (PDF).
51. ^ “Recommendation 1836 (2008)”. Realising the full potential of e-learning for education and training. Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 22 March 2013. Retrieved 7 May 2013.
52. ^ Craft, Anna (July 2012). “Childhood in a digital age: creative challenges for educational futures” (PDF). London Review of Education. 10 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/14748460.2012.691282. S2CID 143731693. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 December 2018. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
53. ^ “Technology in Schools: Weighing The Pros And Cons”. Huffington Post. 25 May 2011. Archived from the original on 23 April 2014. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
54. ^ “Study: Online Course Enrollment Rising Rapidly at Private Nonprofits”. U.S. News. 3 May 2017. Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved 3 May 2017.
55. ^ “As Schools Close Over Coronavirus, Protect Kids’ Privacy in Online Learning”. Human Rights Watch. 27 March 2020. Archived from the original on 10 April 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
56. ^ Sean, Allan (25 September 2020). “How Covid-19 brought the University of Toronto Class of ’24 Together Online”. Brooke Godfrey. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 9 August 2021.
57. ^ Unesco (5 March 2020). “Distance learning solutions”. Archived from the original on 31 March 2020. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
58. ^ Kaplan, Andreas (6 April 2021). Higher Education at the Crossroads of Disruption: the University of the 21st Century. Emerald Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-80071-504-2. Archived from the original on 29 January 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2021.
59. ^ “13 investors say lifelong learning is taking edtech mainstream”. TechCrunch. 28 January 2021. Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
60. ^ Green, Thomas (1971). The activities of teaching. McGraw Hill.
61. ^ Skinner, B.F. (1954). “The science of learning and the art of teaching”. Harvard Educational Review. 24: 86–97.
62. ^ Skinner, B.F. (1958). “Teaching machines”. Science. 128 (3330): 969–77. Bibcode:1958Sci…128..969S. doi:10.1126/science.128.3330.969. PMID 13592277. and others see “Dr. Burrhus Frederic Skinner: A Bibliography” (PDF). bfskinner.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 December 2008.
63. ^ Skinner BF (1965). “The technology of teaching”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 162 (989): 427–43. Bibcode:1965RSPSB.162..427S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1965.0048. PMID 4378497. S2CID 144957844.
64. ^ Skinner, B.F. (1968). “The technology of teaching”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 162 (989). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts: 427–43. Bibcode:1965RSPSB.162..427S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1965.0048. PMID 4378497. S2CID 144957844. Library of Congress Card Number 68-12340 E 81290.
65. ^ Jump up to:^a b Irby, Beverly; Brown, Genevieve; Lara-Alecio, Rafael; Jackson, Shirley (2013). Handbook of Educational Theories. Charlotte, NC: IAP. p. 105. ISBN 978-1-61735-866-1.
66. ^ Hergenhahn, B.R. (2008). An Introduction to the History of Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 627. ISBN 978-0-495-50621-8.
67. ^ deJong, T. (2010). “Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, and Instructional Design: Some Food for Thought”. Instructional Science: 38.
68. ^ Jump up to:^a b Utley, Rose (2010). Theory and Research for Academic Nurse Educators: Application to Practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning LLC. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-7637-7413-4.
69. ^ Termos, Mohamad (2012). “Does the Classroom Performance System (CPS) Increase Students’ Chances for Getting a Good Grade in College Core Courses and Increase Retention?”. International Journal of Technologies in Learning. 19 (1): 45–56. doi:10.18848/2327-0144/cgp/v19i01/49144.
70. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Rosenberg, Richard (2004). The Social Impact of Computers. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-597121-8.
71. ^ Cassidy, Margaret (2004). Book Ends: The Changing Media Environment of American Classrooms. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. p. 223. ISBN 978-1-57273-492-0.
72. ^ Cassidy, Margaret (2004). Book Ends: The Changing Media Environment of American Classrooms. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. p. 224. ISBN 978-1-57273-492-0.
73. ^ Rosenberg, Richard (2004). The Social Impact of Computers. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. p. 219. ISBN 978-0-12-597121-8.
74. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bates, A. and Poole, G. Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/John Wiley, 2003
75. ^ OECD (2005) E-Learning in Tertiary Education: Where Do We Stand? Paris: OECD
76. ^ Baker, Celia (4 January 2013). “Blended learning: Teachers plus computers equal success”. Desert News. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2014.
77. ^ Strauss, Valerie (22 September 2012). “Three fears about blended learning”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 16 July 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
78. ^ Kaplan, Andreas (2017). Rishi, Bikramjit; Bandyopadhyay, Subir (eds.). “Academia Goes Social Media, MOOC, SPOC, SMOC, and SSOC: The digital transformation of Higher Education Institutions and Universities”. Contemporary Issues in Social Media Marketing. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315563312-2.
79. ^ Al-Asfour, A (2012). “Online Teaching: Navigating Its Advantages, Disadvantages and Best Practices”. Tribal College Journal of American Indian Higher Education. 23: 3.
80. ^ Loutchko, Iouri; Kurbel, Karl; Pakhomov, Alexei: Production and Delivery of Multimedia Courses for Internet Based Virtual Education; The World Congress “Networked Learning in a Global Environment: Challenges and Solutions for Virtual Education”, Berlin, Germany, 1–4 May 2002
81. ^ “Podcasts in Education: What, Why and How?” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2012.
82. ^ “Asynchronous Learning: Definition, Benefits, and Example Activities”. Archived from the original on 25 October 2019. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
83. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} “Collaborative asynchronous online learning”. US Patent Office. 10 March 2014. Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2019.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
84. ^ Trentin G. (2010). Networked Collaborative Learning: Social Interaction and Active Learning Archived 17 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Woodhead/Chandos Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, ISBN 978-1-84334-501-5.^{[page needed]}
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Crane B. “Using Web 2.0 Tools in the K-12 Classroom”. Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc., 2009
86. ^ Sendall, P; Ceccucci, W.; Peslak, A. (December 2008). “Web 2.0 Matters: An Analysis of Implementing Web 2.0 in the Classroom”. Information Systems Education Journal. 6 (64). Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
87. ^ Redecker, Christine (2009). “Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe”. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (EUR 23664 EN – 2009). Archived from the original on 7 December 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
88. ^ Jump up to:^a b Seely Brown, John; Adler, Richard P. (2008). “Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0” (PDF). Educause Review (January/February 2008): 16–32. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2014. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
89. ^ “UCI’s iMedEd Initiative named a 2012-13 Apple Distinguished Program”. news.uci.edu. 11 February 2013. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
90. ^ “Escuela 2.0”. Ite.educacion.es. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
91. ^ “Scuola Digitale ” Cl@ssi 2.0″. Scuola-digitale.it. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
92. ^ Lee, Yuan-Hsuan (October 2015). “Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment”. Computers & Education. 88: 182–191. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.004.
93. ^ “What is collaborative learning?”. spiral.ac. Archived from the original on 3 August 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
94. ^ Friess, Erin; Lam, Chris (October 2018). “Cultivating a Sense of Belonging: Using Twitter to Establish a Community in an Introductory Technical Communication Classroom”. Technical Communication Quarterly. 27 (4): 343–361. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1520435. S2CID 149660410.
95. ^ Verzosa Hurley, Elise; Kimme Hea, Amy C. (January 2014). “The Rhetoric of Reach: Preparing Students for Technical Communication in the Age of Social Media”. Technical Communication Quarterly. 23 (1): 55–68. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850854. ISSN 1057-2252. S2CID 219639973.
96. ^ Kimme Hea, Amy C. (January 2014). “Social Media in Technical Communication”. Technical Communication Quarterly. 23 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850841. ISSN 1057-2252. S2CID 219641115.
97. ^ Bowdon, Melody A. (1 January 2014). “Tweeting an Ethos: Emergency Messaging, Social Media, and Teaching Technical Communication”. Technical Communication Quarterly. 23 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850853. ISSN 1057-2252. S2CID 145413489.
98. ^ Vie, Stephanie (3 July 2017). “Training Online Technical Communication Educators to Teach with Social Media: Best Practices and Professional Recommendations”. Technical Communication Quarterly. 26 (3): 344–359. doi:10.1080/10572252.2017.1339487. ISSN 1057-2252. S2CID 66942296.
99. ^ Sheeraz Ahmad Sheergugri; Nazeer Ahmad Khan; Nisar Ahmad Kumar (30 April 2023). “Understand Flipped Learning as an Effective Tool for Enhancing Thinking and Learning”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology: 746–749. doi:10.48175/ijarsct-10419g. ISSN 2581-9429.
100. ^ Pozo-Sánchez, Santiago; Segura-Robles, Adrián; Moreno-Guerrero, Antonio José; López-Belmonte, Jesús (2 December 2022). “Benefits of Using the Learning Management System based on Flipped Learning Methodology”. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. 24: 1–14. doi:10.24320/redie.2022.24.e24.4094. hdl:10481/82873. ISSN 1607-4041.
101. ^ Hall, Ashley A.; DuFrene, Debbie D. (June 2016). “Best Practices for Launching a Flipped Classroom”. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 79 (2): 234–242. doi:10.1177/2329490615606733. ISSN 2329-4906. S2CID 61904212.
102. ^ Ryan, Michael D.; Reid, Scott A. (12 January 2016). “Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Student Performance and Retention: A Parallel Controlled Study in General Chemistry”. Journal of Chemical Education. 93 (1): 13–23. Bibcode:2016JChEd..93…13R. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00717. ISSN 0021-9584.
103. ^ Khanova, Julia; Roth, Mary T; Rodgers, Jo Ellen; McLaughlin, Jacqueline E (2015). “Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum”. Medical Education. 49 (10): 1038–1048. doi:10.1111/medu.12807. PMID 26383075.
104. ^ Chen, Li-Ling (2016). “Impacts of Flipped Classroom in High School Health Education”. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 44 (4): 411–420. doi:10.1177/0047239515626371. ISSN 0047-2395.
105. ^ Moraros, John; Islam, Adiba; Yu, Stan; Banow, Ryan; Schindelka, Barbara (28 February 2015). “Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting”. BMC Medical Education. 15 (1): 27. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2. ISSN 1472-6920. PMC 4363198. PMID 25884508.
106. ^ Wanner, Thomas; Palmer, Edward (2015). “Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course”. Computers & Education. 88: 354–369. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008. ISSN 0360-1315.
107. ^ Forehand, M. (2010). “Bloom’s Taxonomy. From Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology”. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 25 October 2012.
108. ^ Reeves, Thomas C. (12 February 1998). The Impact of Media and Technology in Schools (PDF) (Report). University of Georgia. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 9 October 2013.
109. ^ Menkhoff, Thomas; Thang, Tze Yian; Wong, Yue Kee (September 2007). Evaluating the Blending of an E-Learning Module into a Knowledge Management Course: A Case Study from the Singapore Management University (SMU). Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Learning 2007, Lisbon, 6–8 July 2007 – via Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business.
110. ^ Cuesta-Cambra, Ubaldo; Niño-González, José-Ignacio; Rodríguez-Terceño, José (1 July 2017). “The Cognitive Processing of an Educational App with EEG and ‘Eye Tracking'”. Comunicar. 25 (52): 41–50. doi:10.3916/c52-2017-04. hdl:10272/14086.
111. ^ Dieker, Lisa A.; Lane, Holly B.; Allsopp, David H.; O’Brien, Chris; Butler, Tyran Wright; Kyger, Maggie; Lovin, LouAnn; Fenty, Nicole S. (7 April 2009). “Evaluating Video Models of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices to Enhance Teacher Learning”. Teacher Education and Special Education. 32 (2): 180–196. doi:10.1177/0888406409334202. S2CID 143967113.
112. ^ Biocchi, Michael. “Games in the Classroom”. Gaming in the Classroom. Archived from the original on 15 August 2011. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
113. ^ “Screencasting | Teaching and Learning Innovation Park”. Ipark.hud.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
114. ^ Shiao, Dennis. “Why Virtual Classrooms Are Excellent Learning Venues”. INXPO. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
115. ^ Kolpashnikova, Kamila; Bartolic, Silvia (2019). “Digital divide in quantitative methods: The effects of computer-assisted instruction and students’ attitudes on knowledge acquisition”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 35 (2): 208–217. doi:10.1111/jcal.12322. S2CID 69552601.
116. ^ Tremblay, Eric (2010). “Educating the Mobile Generation – using personal cell phones as audience response systems in post-secondary science teaching”. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 29 (2): 217–227. Archived from the original on 31 October 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
117. ^ Terras, Melody M.; Ramsay, Judith (September 2012). “The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning”. British Journal of Educational Technology. 43 (5): 820–832. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01362.x. Archived from the original on 2 June 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
118. ^ Kester, Liesbeth; Kirschner, Paul; Corbalan, Gemma (May 2007). “Designing support to facilitate learning in powerful electronic learning environments”. Computers in Human Behavior. 23 (3): 1047–1054. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.564.4050. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.001.
119. ^ Campaña, Laura V.; Ouimet, Donald A. (January–February 2015). “iStimulation: Apple iPad Use with Ch”. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 109 (1): 67–72. doi:10.1177/0145482X1510900110. S2CID 52225700.
120. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Use of digital technology in education: Literature review” (PDF). South Australian Department for Education. 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
121. ^ Komal, Saxena; Abdul, Basit; Shukla, Vinod Kumar (27 December 2021). “Green Internet of Things (G-IoT) Technologies, Application, and Future Challenges”. Green Internet of Things and Machine Learning. pp. 317–348. doi:10.1002/9781119793144.ch12. ISBN 9781119792031.
122. ^ Jamieson, Peter; Herdtner, Jeff (October 2015). More missing the Boat — Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and small prototyping boards and engineering education needs them (Research Paper) (Report).
123. ^ Jump up to:^a b Courts, B. & Tucker, J. (2012). “Using Technology To Create A Dynamic Classroom Experience”. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. 9 (2), 121–128.
124. ^ “Can Tweeting Help Your Teaching?”. NEA. Archived from the original on 1 December 2009. Retrieved 8 April 2015.
125. ^ Murray, Kristine; Rhonda Waller (May–June 2007). “Social Networking Goes Abroad” (PDF). Education Abroad. 16 (3): 56–59. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013.
126. ^ Beagle, Martha; Hudges, Don. “Social Networking in Education”. pelinks4u.org. Archived from the original on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013.
127. ^ Pilgrim, Jodi; Christie Bledsoe (1 September 2011). “Learning Through Facebook: A Potential Tool for Educators”. Delta Kappa Gamma.
128. ^ Jump up to:^a b Carpenter S. Definition: Whiteboard Archived 27 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine. TechTarget.
129. ^ Mutsvairo, Bruce, ed. (2016). Digital Activism in the Social Media Era. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40949-8. ISBN 978-3-319-40948-1.
130. ^ Farwell (2013). “Keeping an Online Class Interesting and Interactive”. Distance Learning. 10 (3): 27–32.
131. ^ “A real-time interactive virtual classroom multimedia distance learning system”.
132. ^ McKinney, M. D. (1 September 1985). “Legislative Strategies Used by United School Administrators”. Educational Considerations. 12 (2). doi:10.4148/0146-9282.1727. ISSN 0146-9282.
133. ^ “RKDF UNIVERSITY | EDUCATION GLORIFIES NATION”. rkdf.ac.in. Retrieved 25 May 2024.
134. ^ “Student Services for Online Learners – OnlineEducation.com”. www.onlineeducation.com. Retrieved 25 May 2024.
135. ^ Vegas, Emiliana (14 April 2020). “School Closures, Government Responses, and Learning Inequality Around the World during COVID-19”. Brookings. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
136. ^ Sharples, Mike (November 2013). “Shared orchestration within and beyond the classroom” (PDF). Computers & Education. 69: 504–506. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.014. ISSN 0360-1315. S2CID 12469826. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
137. ^ Sarasota, Darya; Ali Khalid; Sören Auer; Jörg Unbehauen (2013). “Crowd Learn: Crowdsourcing the Creation of Highly-structured E-Learning Content”. 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education CSEDU 2013. Archived from the original on 20 November 2019. Retrieved 12 July 2014.
138. ^ “Teachers Manual on Formative Assessment” (PDF).
139. ^ “Technology-enabled learning: More than e-Learning – Part 1: What does technology-enabled training management look like?”. Training Development Excellence Essentials. Archived from the original on 16 March 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2017.